On the Catalyzing Effect of Randomness on the Per-Flow Throughput in Wireless Networks

This paper investigates the throughput capacity of a flow crossing a multi-hop wireless network, whose geometry is characterized by general randomness laws including Uniform, Poisson, Heavy-Tailed distributions for both the nodes' densities and the number of hops. The key contribution is to demonstrate \textit{how} the \textit{per-flow throughput} depends on the distribution of 1) the number of nodes $N_j$ inside hops' interference sets, 2) the number of hops $K$, and 3) the degree of spatial correlations. The randomness in both $N_j$'s and $K$ is advantageous, i.e., it can yield larger scalings (as large as $\Theta(n)$) than in non-random settings. An interesting consequence is that the per-flow capacity can exhibit the opposite behavior to the network capacity, which was shown to suffer from a logarithmic decrease in the presence of randomness. In turn, spatial correlations along the end-to-end path are detrimental by a logarithmic term

Two extensions of Kingman's GI/G/1 bound

A simple bound in GI/G/1 queues was obtained by Kingman using a discrete martingale transform. We extend this technique to 1) multiclass $\Sigma\textrm{GI/G/1}$ queues and 2) Markov Additive Processes (MAPs) whose background processes can be time-inhomogeneous or have an uncountable state-space. Both extensions are facilitated by a necessary and sufficient ordinary differential equation (ODE) condition for MAPs to admit continuous martingale transforms. Simulations show that the bounds on waiting time distributions are almost exact in heavy-traffic, including the cases of 1) heterogeneous input, e.g., mixing Weibull and Erlang-k classes and 2) Generalized Markovian Arrival Processes, a new class extending the Batch Markovian Arrival Processes to continuous batch sizes

Scheduling analysis with martingales

This paper proposes a new characterization of queueing systems by bounding a suitable exponential transform with a martingale. The constructed martingale is quite versatile in the sense that it captures queueing systems with Markovian and autoregressive arrivals in a unified manner; the second class is particularly relevant due to Wold’s decomposition of stationary processes. Moreover, using the framework of stochastic network calculus, the martingales allow for a simple handling of typical queueing operations: (1) flows’ multiplexing translates into multiplying the corresponding martingales, and (2) scheduling translates into time-shifting the martingales. The emerging calculus is applied to estimate the per-flow delay for FIFO, SP, and EDF scheduling. Unlike state-of-the-art results, our bounds capture a fundamental exponential leading constant in the number of multiplexed flows, and additionally are numerically tight

Exact Analysis of TTL Cache Networks: The Case of Caching Policies driven by Stopping Times

TTL caching models have recently regained significant research interest, largely due to their ability to fit popular caching policies such as LRU. This paper advances the state-of-the-art analysis of TTL-based cache networks by developing two exact methods with orthogonal generality and computational complexity. The first method generalizes existing results for line networks under renewal requests to the broad class of caching policies whereby evictions are driven by stopping times. The obtained results are further generalized, using the second method, to feedforward networks with Markov arrival processes (MAP) requests. MAPs are particularly suitable for non-line networks because they are closed not only under superposition and splitting, as known, but also under input-output caching operations as proven herein for phase-type TTL distributions. The crucial benefit of the two closure properties is that they jointly enable the first exact analysis of feedforward networks of TTL caches in great generality

Randomized load balancing in finite regimes

Randomized load balancing is a cost efficient policy for job scheduling in parallel server queueing systems whereby, with every incoming job, a central dispatcher randomly polls some servers and selects the one with the smallest queue. By exactly deriving the jobs' delay distribution in such systems, in explicit and closed form, Mitzenmacher~\cite{Mi03} proved the so-called `power-of-two' result, which states that by randomly polling only two servers yields an exponential improvement in delay over randomly selecting a single server. Such a fundamental result, however, was obtained in an asymptotic regime in the total number of servers, and does do not necessarily provide accurate estimates for practical finite regimes with small or moderate number of servers. In this paper we obtain stochastic lower and upper bounds on the jobs' average delay in non-asymptotic/finite regimes, by borrowing ideas for analyzing the particular case of Join-the-Shortest-Queue (JSQ) policy. Numerical illustrations indicate not only that the obtained (lower) bounds are remarkably accurate, but also that the existing exact but asymptotic results can be largely misleading in finite regimes (e.g., by more than $100\%$ in the case of $12$ servers)

Towards a System Theoretic Approach to Wireless Network Capacity in Finite Time and Space

In asymptotic regimes, both in time and space (network size), the derivation of network capacity results is grossly simplified by brushing aside queueing behavior in non-Jackson networks. This simplifying double-limit model, however, lends itself to conservative numerical results in finite regimes. To properly account for queueing behavior beyond a simple calculus based on average rates, we advocate a system theoretic methodology for the capacity problem in finite time and space regimes. This methodology also accounts for spatial correlations arising in networks with CSMA/CA scheduling and it delivers rigorous closed-form capacity results in terms of probability distributions. Unlike numerous existing asymptotic results, subject to anecdotal practical concerns, our transient one can be used in practical settings: for example, to compute the time scales at which multi-hop routing is more advantageous than single-hop routing

Stochastic bounds in fork-join queueing systems under full and partial mapping

In a Fork-Join (FJ) queueing system an upstream fork station splits incoming jobs into N tasks to be further processed by N parallel servers, each with its own queue; the response time of one job is determined, at a downstream join station, by the maximum of the corresponding tasks’ response times. This queueing system is useful to the modelling of multi-service systems subject to synchronization constraints, such as MapReduce clusters or multipath routing. Despite their apparent simplicity, FJ systems are hard to analyze. This paper provides the first computable stochastic bounds on the waiting and response time distributions in FJ systems under full (bijective) and partial (injective) mapping of tasks to servers. We consider four practical scenarios by combining 1a) renewal and 1b) non-renewal arrivals, and 2a) non-blocking and 2b) blocking servers. In the case of non-blocking servers we prove that delays scale as O(log N), a law which is known for first moments under renewal input only. In the case of blocking servers, we prove that the same factor of log N dictates the stability region of the system. Simulation results indicate that our bounds are tight, especially at high utilizations, in all four scenarios. A remarkable insight gained from our results is that, at moderate to high utilizations, multipath routing “makes sense” from a queueing perspective for two paths only, i.e., response times drop the most when N = 2; the technical explanation is that the resequencing (delay) price starts to quickly dominate the tempting gain due to multipath transmissions

Viewing Impaired Video Transmissions From a Modeling Perspective

1

Characterizing the impact of the workload on the value of dynamic resizing in data centers

Energy consumption imposes a significant cost for data centers; yet much of that energy is used to maintain excess service capacity during periods of predictably low load. Resultantly, there has recently been interest in developing designs that allow the service capacity to be dynamically resized to match the current workload. However, there is still much debate about the value of such approaches in real settings. In this paper, we show that the value of dynamic resizing is highly dependent on statistics of the workload process. In particular, both slow time-scale non-stationarities of the workload (e.g., the peak-to-mean ratio) and the fast time-scale stochasticity (e.g., the burstiness of arrivals) play key roles. To illustrate the impact of these factors, we combine optimization-based modeling of the slow time-scale with stochastic modeling of the fast time-scale. Within this framework, we provide both analytic and numerical results characterizing when dynamic resizing does (and does not) provide benefits